Additions, with occasional commentary, to my on-line collection of propaganda from Nazi Germany and the German Democratic Republic
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
Goebbels Speaks after the 1944 Assassination Attempt on Hitler
Wednesday, March 5, 2025
My Talk on Nazi Propaganda at the Harold Deutsch Roundtable
Thursday, November 30, 2023
Rudolf Hess and Complainers
Tuesday, August 25, 2020
Luther and Hitler 1933
I would like to know more about this poster. It was issued in 1933 on the 450th anniversary of Luther’s birth. I do not know anything more than that, and would welcome enlightenment.
The translation: “Hitler’s battle and Luther’s teaching are the German people’s sure defense.”
Saturday, January 11, 2020
Goebbels on Hitler’s Takeover (1933)
Saturday, December 17, 2016
My Talk on FDR and Hitler on CSPAN3
on the following schedule:
- Dec 18, 2016 | 8:00pm EST | C-SPAN 3
- Dec 19, 2016 | 12:00am EST | C-SPAN 3
- Dec 24, 2016 | 11:45am EST | C-SPAN 3
- Dec 25, 2016 | 4:45am EST | C-SPAN 3
Friday, April 22, 2016
A 1932 Nazi Pamphlet
Today I’m adding a pamphlet from the first round of the 1932 German presidential election, titled Adolf Hitler: German Worker and Front Soldier. It was issued by the party’s propaganda office in Munich and surely had an enormous distribution.
It gives a brief biography and attempts to demonstrate Hitler’s leadership by a variety of examples.
Thursday, January 14, 2016
A Lot of New Material on the Nazi Speaker System
Today I’m adding a dozen or so editions of the Redner-Schnellinformation, an irregular publication for speakers. Some are from the beginning of the crisis on the Eastern Front. Others deal with how to treat foreign leaders, how to present Rommel’s victories in Africa, or what to say to women.
This material was done in haste, often in response to immediate events. Mistakes sometimes occur. For example, in #24 (4 January 1942) speakers are instructed:
We have a political interest in distinguishing clearly and intentionally that part of the American continent, namely North America, that is waging war against us from the other countries of the American continent. Avoid, therefore, speaking of America as the enemy, but rather always heed the fact that our enemy is not all of America, but rather onlyNorth America or the United States of North America, or the USA. Speakers should be sure to clearly distinguish these terms.
Issue #26 (21 February 1942) followed these instructions. However, they were forgotten by issue #28 (14 March 1942), in which there is this passage:
Given the continuing attempts through using reports of German losses in the East, through lying reports of vast armaments capacity in America, through political agitation in the occupied territories and in the neutral world, etc., they try to create the impression that they have not been affected by the results of the war and that we have no chance of final victory.I also added two essays by Joseph Goebbels from Das Reich that speakers were instructed to use as the basis of their speeches: “What is Sacrifice” and “A Word to All.”
Thursday, September 11, 2014
Nazism and Cities
She concludes:
“My bottom line: urbanization is a political process. Most of us are urbanites, and for most of us, urbanization has meant modernization and economic progress. But have we reached a new plateau, a place where we have reached the limits of the economic benefits of urban growth? How will the politics of cities evolve?”
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Letters to Adolf Hitler
The book also recommends the German Propaganda Archive (p. 202) as a good site for those wanting further information.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
A 1938 Painting of Adolf Hitler Surfaces
I am not familiar with the artist, one F. Thiele. I welcome information from anyone who know more about the artist or this painting.
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Three New Images: Two Posters and Hitler Art
A good general summary of Hitler’s paintings from a 1998 article reprinted by Snyder’s Treasures, another dealer in such items.
Monday, March 26, 2012
A 1937 Oil Painting of Adolf Hitler
This and other art pieces depicting Hitler are available on the Hitler portraits page.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Paintings from Hitler’s Personal Collection
A Nazi art magazine Kunst dem Volk considered it a masterpiece:
“The pale colors, the splendid presentation, and the solemnity of the moment are emphasized in this picture, which has an almost monumental character. Although the painting demonstrates the artistic understanding of the painter and also his mastery of drawing, one forgets it all because of the artist’s splendid work, accepting it as obvious and given. That is probably the best that a painting can do.”It turns out that the painting ended up in Hitler’s personal collection and disappeared after the war. It was just found in a Czech monastery along with six other paintings.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Nazi Pamphlet “Hitler to Brüning” (December 1931)
It is an interesting example of Hitler’s rhetorical style — and was at the time persuasive not only to his Nazi followers, but probably to many others as well.
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Another Fabricated Hitler Quotation
Today I’m adding a quotation found in more than 1,700,000 web pages and a fair number of books. Hitler is alleged to have said: “What luck for rulers that men do not think.” I’m not absolutely certain is it a fabrication, but I’m almost sure. It isn’t in Mein Kampf, nor the published edition of Hitler’s speeches. No one I can find who cites it provide a source. One book cited by several others provides the quotation, but no source.
But it sounds like what people think Hitler would have said, so it keeps spreading.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
More on a Bad Translation of Mein Kampf
What I find astonishing, although it is typical of Internet discussions, is that those who for some reason like his translation accuse me of making up Ford's mistakes.
Well, I suppose it is time to make the evidence available. I've started a page that demonstrates errors in Michael Ford's translation. If anyone is interested, I'll add to the page as time goes on.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
A 1936 Nazi Reading Primer
Monday, September 6, 2010
German City Maps from 1938
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
The Case of the Curious Translation of Mein Kampf
Ordinarily, I post items here that relate directly to the German Propaganda Archive. This is one of the occasional exceptions.
Two months back, I was reading the Wikipedia article on Mein Kampf. According to said article, the finest translation was that by one Michael Ford. That interested me. I know a lot about Mein Kampf, and I had never heard of it. I looked into it. Ford, as it turned out, had self-published the translation, then using the anonymity offered by Wikipedia, and in violation of its policies, had inserted the high praise. I removed those edits. When he discovered that a month or so later, he tried to re-insert his praise of his own book, but the violations of Wikipedia policies were so clear that others promptly reverted his edits as fast as he made them. He's given up on that, at least for the moment.
Then I want to amazon, where I found the book was selling well, in part due to a number of 5-star reviews that appeared suspiciously soon after the book’s publication last summer. He had also published a book that promoted his translation, claiming he had the only “correct” translation, one that remedied all sorts of previous errors. Mr. Ford is clearly a master of self-promotion. He is, by the way, a self-described entrepreneur whose other books include how to avoid being scammed on eBay and finding a job if you are a felon. Despite my requests, he has not provided any information on his background that would make one likely to trust his ability to translate Mein Kampf, which is a challenge even for experienced translators.
I posted a negative review, pointing out some typical howlers in translation that he had committed. If you are curious, look up my review on amazon. To date, Mr. Ford simply repeats that his version is the only “correct” one, and claims that it is the standard translation. For obvious reasons, he cannot provide the names of significant scholars in the field who agree with him.
In the meanwhile, Mr. Ford has won the support of a band of “historical revisionists” who are involved in web sites that try to appear as “objective” scholarly sites, though a quick read reveals their nature. I do not think Mr. Ford himself has such tendencies — but he is happy to accept the support of anyone who approves of his work, as best as I can tell.